Today: 23 June 2025
27 January 2024
5 mins read

International Court of Justice raps Israel

The court did not order that a ceasefire be implemented. The ruling by the court was agreed upon by a 15 to 2 vote…reports Asian Lite News

In a ruling, the International Court of Justice in the Hague ordered Israel to ‘take all measures’ to prevent genocide in Gaza. However, the court did not order that a ceasefire be implemented. The ruling by the court was agreed upon by a 15 to 2 vote.

Additionally, Israel was ordered to report back to the court in one month. Among diplomats, the provisional order against Israel is considered a diplomatic blow and is a step towards ruling in favor of South Africa’s genocide claim. However, the ruling, while legally binding, is difficult to enforce.

Commenting on the ruling, Israel Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir said, “The decision of the anti-Semitic court in The Hague proves what was known in advance: this court does not seek justice, but rather the persecution of the Jewish people. They were silent during the Holocaust and today they continue hypocritically and take another step. The Hague, Shamag! Decisions that endanger the continued existence of the State of Israel must not be listened to. And we must continue defeating the enemy until complete victory.”

At the beginning of the hearing, President of the International Court of Justice Judge Joan E. Donoghue announced that the court had rejected Israel’s motion to declare the court had no jurisdiction in the matter.

“In the court’s view, at least some of the acts and omissions committed by Israel in Gaza appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the genocide convention. In light of the following, the court concludes it has prima facie jurisdiction to entertain the case on the basis of Article 9 of the Genocide Convention…..The court cannot accede to Israel’s request that it not entertain the application,” said Donoghue.

In the court’s ruling, Donoghue noted comments made by Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, then-Energy Minister Yisrael Katz and President Isaac Herzog, which she claimed could be read as seeking to kill civilians in Gaza.

“The aforementioned facts and circumstances are sufficient to conclude that at least some rights of the Palestinians to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts in Article 3 of the Genocide Convention, and the rights of South Africa to seek protection of these rights,” said Donoghue.

Experts noted that the court’s move gives legitimacy to South Africa’s claim that the Palestinians need to be protected from genocide by Israel under the terms of the Genocide Convention.

The court, however, did not rule that Israel must end its war in Gaza.

The court restricted itself to only ordering provisional emergency restrictions on Israel’s military activities in the Strip, which was requested by South Africa during hearings on January 11 and 12.

Legal experts said it could take years for a final ruling on whether Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians.

At least 1,200 people were killed in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Additionally, some 250 Israelis and foreigners were taken to Gaza as hostages. The number of men, women, children, and soldiers held captive is now believed to be 136.

During the mid-January hearings, South Africa argued that Israel’s military campaign was intended to cause “the destruction of the population” of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli representatives, led by former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak, rejected the claims, arguing that Israel has a right to defend itself, respects international law, and that Palestinian casualties were the result of Hamas embedding its tunnels and military infrastructure in civilian areas.

Israel, which is not a member of the ICJ, also argued that the court has no jurisdiction to issue a ruling.

The ICJ describes itself as “the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.” Any ruling issued by the court would have to be enforced by the UN Security Council. The council’s five permanent members, the US, Russia, China, Britain, and France, have veto power over any measures ordered by the court.

The 17-judge panel’s ruling was only about ordering provisional emergency restrictions on Israel’s military activities in the Strip, as requested by South Africa during hearings on January 11 and 12. A final ruling on the merits of South Africa’s arguments — that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians — is expected to take years.

Israel asked the court to reject the case outright.

At least 1,200 people were killed in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Around 250 Israelis and foreigners were taken to Gaza as hostages. The number of men, women, children and soldiers held captive is now believed to be 136.

During the mid-January hearings, South Africa argued that Israel’s military campaign was intended to cause “the destruction of the population” of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli representatives led by former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak rejected the claims, arguing that Israel has a right to defend itself, respects international law, and that Palestinian casualties were the result of Hamas embedding its tunnels and military infrastructure in civilian areas.

Israel, which is not a member of the ICJ, also argued that the court has no jurisdiction to issue a ruling.

The ICJ describes itself as “the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.” Any ruling issued by the court would have to be enforced by the UN Security Council. The council’s five permanent members, the US, Russia, China, Britain, and France, have veto power over any measures. (ANI/TPS)

ALSO READ-Red Sea Conflict Hits Trade, Suez Shipping Plummets

Previous Story

Indian Warship Responds To Distress Call From Merchant Vessel In Gulf Of Aden

Next Story

UK to pause funding for UN aid agency for Palestinian refugees

Latest from -Top News

Netanyahu: Iran Goals Near

Netanyahu pledged not to let Israel get dragged into a “war of attrition” with Tehran…reports Asian Lite News Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed on Sunday that Israel is “very close” to

Khamenei Vows Payback

Calling the attacks “a big crime,” Khamenei warned of retaliation….reports Asian Lite News Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Monday, in his first reaction following the US strikes on Iranian nuclear

US committed great crime: Iran

Iran has now called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and demanded the IAEA Board of Governors address the situation….reports Asian Lite News Iran has strongly condemned the United

Strike Iran, Face Us, Houthis warn US

The Yemen-based Houthi group, which controls much of northern Yemen, has been targeting Israel since November 2023…reports Asian Lite News Yemen’s Houthi group issued a stark warning on Sunday, declaring they would

Tehran Hits Back After US Strikes

The missiles struck several locations across central Israel. Notably, one hit Haifa without any prior warning sirens, raising alarm over possible gaps in the missile alert system….reports Asian Lite News Iran fired
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Sunak, Salman agree on need to de-escalate Israel conflict

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak arrived in Riyadh on Thursday

Israel Attacks Iran

It comes few days after Iran had attacked Israel in