Today: 17 April 2025
14 January 2024
2 mins read

Cameron defends attack on Houthis

Cameron argues that the decision to participate in military action was grounded in the need to defend vital national interests, particularly for a trading nation with one of the most open economies…reports Asian Lite News

British Foreign Secretary David Cameron justifies the decision to launch airstrikes against the Houthis in the Red Sea. The former prime minister justified it as a necessary response to relentless attacks on international shipping by Houthi rebels. Cameron emphasizes the critical importance of safeguarding the freedom of navigation and preventing illegal and unacceptable actions that could disrupt vital sea lanes.

Cameron, who provides insights into the decision-making process within the Cabinet, highlights the meticulous examination of alternatives and the thorough consideration of every relevant factor. The attacks on shipping in the Red Sea since November 19, totaling 26 incidents, raised concerns about the potential disruption of crucial supply chains and the impact on global prices.

Cameron underscores the global nature of the coalition formed to protect shipping in the Red Sea, with the Royal Navy actively participating in Operation Prosperity Guardian. Despite diplomatic efforts and warnings, the attacks persisted, leading the United States to request British assistance through limited and targeted military action.

Cameron argues that the decision to participate in military action was grounded in the need to defend vital national interests, particularly for a trading nation with one of the most open economies. He draws parallels to the campaign against Somali pirates in the same region during his tenure as Prime Minister, emphasizing the importance of collective action.

Addressing the timing of the strikes, Cameron clarifies that the decision was not rushed, with ample warning provided to the Houthi rebels. The international community, represented by a coalition of 44 countries and the United Nations Security Council, condemned the attacks, demanding an immediate cessation.

The former Prime Minister reveals direct communication with the Foreign Minister of Iran, a key ally of the Houthis, emphasizing the unequivocal stance that attacks against merchant and commercial shipping are unacceptable. However, the escalation in the number and severity of attacks, culminating in a significant assault on January 9 targeting a British ship and US allies, prompted the military response.

Cameron concludes by asserting the necessity, proportionality, and lawfulness of the airstrikes, emphasizing the Royal Air Force’s efforts to avoid civilian casualties. He dismisses Houthi claims that the actions are linked to Israel and Gaza, emphasizing the global impact of their attacks on ships from various countries.

Ultimately, the column stresses the joint international action’s objective, which aims not only to degrade Houthi capabilities with Iranian backing but also to send an unambiguous message that such actions will not be tolerated, and nations will be prepared to back words with actions.

ALSO READ-Rajnath, Cameron appreciate momentum of India-UK partnership

Previous Story

Airstrikes against Houthis, act of self-defence, says Sunak  

Next Story

Websites of Binance, Kucoin blocked in India

Latest from -Top News

UK-Kenya defence partnership deepened

Defence Secretary met with Agnes Wanjiru’s family to offer condolences, fulfilling his commitment and making him the first UK Minister to meet with them In a historic and emotionally charged visit to

South Africa hosts virtual meeting of G20 Sherpas

During the meeting, Zane Dangor spoke about the importance of continuing to work with multilateral institutions, including the United Nations, to address global challenges South Africa hosted the second virtual meeting of

WFP warns as Sudan war enters third year

The civil war began on April 15, 2023, amid a power struggle between the Sudanese army and the leader of a powerful rival militia called the Rapid Support Forces The conflict, which
Go toTop